Forgot your password? PDF Preview. Table of Contents.
- Herbal Treatments for Healthy Hair: Storey Country Wisdom Bulletin A-221;
- Behemoth: The History of the Elephant in America.
- Alguien con quien hablar (Spanish Edition);
- Middle east.
- SULTANE ANDALOUSE EDITIONS 1 Original (PDF)?
- Cents and Sustainability: Securing Our Common Future by Decoupling Economic Growth from Environmental Pressures;
Restricted Access. Related Content. The expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain represents an important episode of ethnic, political and religious cleansing which affected about , persons.
SAGE Books - Islam and the Sea: The Causes of a Failure
The controversial measure was legimitized by an ideology of religious and political unity that served to defend the expulsion of them all, crypto-Muslims and sincere converts to Christianity alike. The first part focuses on the decision to expel the Moriscos, its historical context and the role of such institutions as the Vatican and the religious orders, and nations such as France, Italy, the Dutch Republic, Morocco and the Ottoman Empire.
The second part studies the aftermath of the expulsion, the forced migrations, settlement and Diaspora of the Moriscos, comparing their vicissitudes with that of the Jewish conversos. Christian-Muslim Relations. A Bibliographical History Volume 8. Northern and Eastern Europe Let everybody know: it is not that this author is a genius who has discovered something that others have not. As we just saw with Cherbonneau, many Western authors, and even Prince Charles himself have referred or noted the vast field of distortions of Muslim accomplishments in sciences and civilisation just as in other fields.
He did not.
So, here, we look at the techniques used to distort the subject of Muslim farming. We focus on three methods used to distort the subject through specific instances on how it is done, and how reality fundamentally contradicts the claims made by the distorters. This technique is the most common.
It consists in supressing from knowledge facts and sources of facts that relate to the role of Islamic civilisation, or anything favourable to Islam. One of the established assumptions is that, just before, or around, the early-mid 18 th century, farmers in the English countryside initiated what is commonly known as the agricultural revolution. English landed classes, it is explained, were helped by the enclosure of land began in 16 th century , which gave them both security and institutional foundations to innovate.
This led to widespread and critical changes such as crop rotation, improvements in animal husbandry, farm experiment, and further improvements.
- Similar authors to follow.
- SULTANE ANDALOUSE EDITIONS 1 Original (PDF)?
- Parent topics.
- Treebank Statistics (UD_French)!
- Beer Kit Magic.
- First Edition from FOLIOS LIMITED - AbeBooks.
- First Edition from FOLIOS LIMITED.
By the mid-late 18 th century, English agriculture, it is explained, managed to release both surplus capital and labour for industry, and provide a wide enough market to give the foundation for the so called Industrial Revolution that began in the late 18 th century.
Further changes greater and better use of fertilisers, improved animal rearing, mechanisation, and the like in England and the rest of the Western world took place in earnest and, as time passed, reached a high momentum, completely reversing the picture that prevailed in past centuries, with poor food production now being replaced by large food surpluses. Simultaneously there was an equally momentous reversal on the wider international level, food purchasing orders now came from the southern countries, which have become unable to feed their fast rising populations, whilst as recently as the 19 th century, it was the opposite, France, for instance, purchasing wheat from Algeria.follow site
International African Bibliography
Figure 6. How do we get mislead about this subject as others? If we read about the Western agricultural revolution and not consult anything about Islamic accomplishments in the field we will never know the reality. In this field, as in others, if no Westerner writes about Islamic accomplishments we think they never existed. Wiedemann, true, wrote about Muslim accomplishments in the field, but that was late in the 19 th and early in the 20 th.
Because nobody wrote anything, it seemed Muslims had accomplished nothing. It only took Donald Hill writing in the s and after for everyone suddenly to realise that the Muslim legacy in the field was considerable, in fact was crucial. The same about agriculture. As we shall see, it is only thanks to Andrew Watson that we suddenly realise that the Muslims have accomplished a lot, indeed, and that they were centuries ahead of the rest.
So, besides omissions, there is another technique to distort the subject, by demeaning the Muslim role. Ashtor claims, for instance:. The numerous accounts of these activities do not point to technological innovations within the irrigation system, which the Muslim rulers had simply taken over from their predecessors. The records in the writings of the Arabic historians show that those who drained the swamps and dug the canals were the Nabateans, not Arabs. The information which the Arabic authors provide us in the methods of agricultural work, besides the irrigation canals and engines, is rather scanty.
But collecting these records from various sources one is inclined to conclude that the Arabs did not improve the methods of agricultural work. There is only slight evidence of technological innovations in near eastern agriculture throughout the Middle Ages, whereas the history of European agriculture is the story of great changes and technological achievements. The Egyptian historian al-Makrizi says that the harvests had diminished so much under Moslem rule that it was necessary to put aside a quarter of even a third of the crop in order to render cultivation profitable.
But the decrease of the crops had probably begun a long time before he wrote. It was the consequence of neglect, of old tired methods of cultivation, of heavy taxation and the attitude of a short sighted Mamluk government. Ashtor dwells on Mamluk incompetence, rapacity, neglect, and they being at the foundation of the Islamic collapse, claiming for instance,.
Ashtor is promoting fallacies, which the subsequent sections will deal with at great length, but a brief refutation of his views is made here. Firstly, with regard to the particular claim that Muslim agriculture was a mere copying of Nabatean farming, the following outline will show that nearly all Islamic innovations in farming were accomplished in the medieval period, thus, centuries apart from the Nabatean model. It will also show that they relate to this model hardly at all, and that, the faith itself, the geographical expansion of Islam, besides experiment on the land, followed by the recording of such experiments in farming treatises, and most of all the outburst of scientific activity in engineering, metallurgy, and other fields, which were the real foundations of the Muslim agricultural revolution.
Had Ashtor consulted the works by Serjeant and others he would have understood that it was the revolution brought by Islam that was at the foundation of so much that affected the sector. A careful reading of the entire text has persuaded this writer Watson that a substantial part of the work was composed at the beginning of the 10 th C. These sections are not, as suggested, a light overlayer in a text the greater part of which is more ancient.
Menu de navigation
They are on the contrary, deeply embedded in the text and a fundamental part of it. Even the discussions of superstitions which were once thought to be much more ancient can sometimes be shown to belong to the time of Ibn Wahshiya. The second claim by Ashtor that the Mamluk rulers of Egypt and Syria did little or nothing to build and maintain engineering works is likewise based on a total disregard for historical facts.
- Bloc-notes : libérer la France de sa prison intellectuelle?
- Italian Lesson 7: Parts of the Body (Easy-Peasy Italian for Kids).
- The Book of Ruth.
Half of the expense was borne by the governor and the other half by the Sultan. This basic investment was followed in the next half century by the construction of fountains throughout the city and branch canals to feed them. Most of these fountains were built by emirs and governors. Butzer and his followers claim that the Muslims did not fundamentally alter the available range of cultivars and technology, and that if it might seem they brought changes to Spanish farming this was simply due to the fact that before them there was a catastrophic decline.
Butzer and his group are wrong, for most of the changes the Muslims brought about were completely unknown to the Romans. Had Butzer and his group been correct in their claim that Islam had little to do with the changes in Spain, they would have found a revolution in farming taking place in other places in Christendom equal in tenor to that taking place in Muslim Spain. Yet, this is not the case, whether in pre-medieval or in medieval Christendom.
Nowhere do we find any advances comparable to those that took place in medieval Islamic Spain; advances, however, shared throughout the medieval Islamic land from the far east to the far west. Also under Islam, agriculture got more produce out of the land by bringing more land under cultivation and by making old land much more productive than in the past. It is necessary to go back to the irreplaceable works by von Kremer, as translated by Khuda Bukhsh, and then find evidence of the vast engineering works for agricultural purposes begun in the times of Omar ibn al Khattab Caliph or under the Ummayads, especially under the stewardship of the Viceroy, al Hajjaj d.
The combination of all such factors brought former dead land into cultivation, and new irrigation techniques and systems also contributed to this. Another instance of demeaning is by Adams, who in his Land Behind Baghdad , draws the conclusion that the density of settlement in the Diyala Plains in Islamic times, as well as the extent of the irrigation system, never reached the high point of later Sasanian times in spite of considerable reconstruction in late Umayyad and early Abbasid times. To prove for a particular region whether in early Islamic times irrigated agriculture had progressed beyond its classical antecedents requires very careful analysis, and the results may not be unambiguous.
There is criticism, and there is criticism. If any nation, just as any person, spends their lives without any self criticism, i. In fact nations or individuals who always dwell on their grandeurs when horrendous flaws characterise them, as history, without fail, has shown us, kept deluding themselves until one day they collapsed and never rose again.
However, there is another type of criticism, which aims to create an inferiority complex in the other, making them so much believe in their vileness or meaninglessness.